Can’t see this video? Download QuickTime from Apple.
What’s Wrong with the Drug Companies
Brenden is a very healthy little boy except for one thing, a chronic case of diaper rash. His poor booty has been every shade of red you can imagine. Suspecting a yeast infection, his pediatrician prescribed a special ointment. Unfortunately, our insurance doesn’t cover it. The cost is around $250 for an 8oz tube that might last a week or two. Once the pharmacist broke the bad news to Jenny, she prepared to leave. Then the pharmacist pulled her close and showed her the list of ingredients for the ointment:
- Triple Paste, an excellent diaper rash cream that we were already using
- Vaseline
- Monistat
“You can make this yourself using over-the-counter ingredients,” the pharmacist said. So we did. We already had the Triple Paste. Jenny bought a tube of store-brand Monistat for about $4 and decided the Vaseline wasn’t really necessary. Total cost: $4 instead of $250.
I’m not saying all drug companies are evil or that all drugs are simply combinations of cheap OTC products. I am saying that it’s really hard not to hate the drug companies as an industry when they combine such cheap, simple ingredients and sell them for over 50 times what the drug cost to produce.
Undy 5000 Dallas
This cracks me up. You can run a 5k at White Rock Lake in your undies to raise money/awareness for colon cancer. They’re calling it the Undy 5000. The Dallas run is Halloween morning.
Pastor Andy would be proud…I think…
From Normal to Cover Girl in 1min 14sec
Dove has a great program called Campaign for Real Beauty that seeks to change our definition of beautiful. One tool is a video called Evolution that shows how lighting, makeup, and Photoshop can transform a normal-looking woman into a model on a billboard. Pretty amazing, eh? Almost any image you see of a woman in a magazine has been digitally altered, sometimes extensively. Kudos to Dove for speaking the truth.
We Have a Name!
Henceforth, Newbie shall be known as Jonathan Andrew Box! See Jonathan’s page for more details.
Liberty and Responsibility
The Obama administration is proposing some new rules for certain federal and other employees to prohibiting texting while driving. Some states already have some restrictions in place regarding the use of cell phones while driving, both for talking and texting. The Dallas Morning News posted a good article on the proposal.
A couple of people I know from work strongly oppose such a law, claiming it’s yet another example of big government interfering with personal liberty. Presumably, in their view, people should have the right to make bad decisions even if those decisions hurt other people. Although I can see their point, I strongly disagree with them.
The primary purpose of law is to force people to behave responsibly when they refuse to do so voluntarily.
People make decisions based on a variety of motivations, such as love, hate, duty, fear, peer pressure, and greed, to name a few. In the case of texting while driving, just like drinking while driving and any number of other choices, positive motivations such as love and duty have failed miserably. Human beings in general just don’t care enough about strangers to stop doing many activities that put others at risk. If our goal as a society is to eliminate the damage caused by people’s stupid choices, legislation and punishment seems to be the only viable solution. Like it or not, the fear of punishment is often the only reason that sinful people like us will do the right thing.
What do you think?